Links
I don't quite like that links actually get a different color when you press them, it kinda ruins the whole design. Is it possible to leave them with the original color after you click them? Oh, of course, this is my opinion, what do you guys think? Sekuiya 21:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
I never really thought about it but I agree. Is it possible to change? SilverRyoshi 8:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, the original color no, but let them start and stay white all the time, the link. I think it will be better. Sekuiya 00:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Another link suggestion: could we make link underline on hover? Would make colored links like item links more obvious. --Cappucciruno (talk) 01:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Tabs and Contents List
The color scheme for both Tabs and Contents List(under the classes section)have been change, and they dont seem to fit with the rest of the layout. Was this intended? soknife 12:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Probably something that came with the upgrade the wiki recieved. Will have to contact the Admin or Bumble. — Sekuiyatalk 00:17, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Links Color Changed to red?
hello there, i have being working on this wiki for the last week and i noticed that today all the links have a different color(red). Before it was (chocolate)?, not sure witch but rightnow red doesnt look very nice with the rest of the disgn. I dont know if this is the new standard? but if it is, then i would like to request to go back to (chocolate) color as it look nicer. This is just my opinion.
ps: i just noticed that the layout changed and all of the "contentboxes" are gone??? is this broken or?? NelDaSi (talk) 12:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
NelDaSi (talk) 12:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Request to add something to the main page!
I would like to add this to the main page but i dont have the proper permissions. Could someone add it for me please? My thanks is great NelDaSi (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 |
| The World |
- added. If you claim this wiki, i will approve your claim and then you will the necessary rights — Game widow (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- I did a couple of days ago but it was rejected. But i just notice that im able to change it now and that you already put it in place (Thank you for that),
so now i guess i have nothing stoping me from making this the best wiki ever (feeling courageous) ;). Once again thank you for trusting me with this. NelDaSi (talk) 00:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
World Map
Right now, there is little confusion about region, zones, world and local maps. We now need to follow the official mapping tree, it means the World consists of Zones, Zones have Regions, and regions have local places. tl;dr version: World > Zone > Region > Local. I will now cleanup any leftover by outdated translations and templates. Anyone editing wiki can still follow old templates, until they will be corrected, in that case you will have to fill Zone and Region values, where applicable. Continents still hadn't been released so they will not be here, they (maybe) will be a future update. Thanks everyone~ --^|_| (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Future content
Are there any guidelines on what to include on the wiki concerning content that does not yet exist in the NA version? It seems wrong to me to have content on the wiki not actually present in the game, even though it might be upcoming content, it doesn't represent reality and can be misleading. I feel that it should be left on forums and other media of the sort where speculation is more welcome. --Cappucciruno (talk) 06:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- The rule of thumb, is if something does not exists (yet), it cannot be added, except anything that comes from official sources, as example the Warlock class existence. Right now we are in the middle of transition from a Wiki initially filled by material coming from other versions (of the game) and user made translations of it, to a Wiki with material coming exclusively from our version of the game or official sources. Just look at Region and Zone terms, that are swapped if compared to user made translations, as an example. That means, any "old" material already here needs to be adapted to the official translations and our game version and it is (still) tolerated being kept here, but any new addition of anything from other versions, is no more welcome because a lot of things as naming, translations, no clues on how the new feature will (and if) be integrated in our version of the game, just to name a few.--^|_| (talk) 21:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)