Talk:World map

Full world map
I like the idea of a full world map, but that image was ridiculously and needlessly large, as well as hosted on a dubious image hosting server, so I removed it for the moment. Additionally is there really a need for icons to identify the regions (World > Zone > Region for clarification)? The names are already on the maps so I feel it isn't necessary. --Cappucciruno (talk) 17:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree about the labeling part. The names are clearly on the images so it's not really necessary to add icons to further name things. A simple list would suffice. Urbancowgurl777 (talk) 19:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What about break down the world page? Make it listing only the Zones, and then each zone will have its own page with regions and locations. This way even region maps can show at a decent size in their zone page and with much more sense than having them in a huge single page.--^&#124;_&#124; (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree the page feels a bit cluttered with information at the moment. However for each zone on this page we could list the regions of each at the very least, otherwise there wouldn't be much information left to display. Then on the regions' pages we can have the different villages, camps, dungeons, etc. --Cirno.png Cappucciruno 01:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Fine to me, World map lists zones (with map) and regions (only names), then region page have its map and lists locations/dungeons (names only), then the single location/dungeon will have its own page as it already happens now. It makes sense and follows the flow of categories too. Fully agree.--^&#124;_&#124; (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)