Talk:Gems (Archived)

Gem type vs size
If you'd like to document what each item's attributes are individually, I would recommend filling out each item's page instead of having it all on this page, as they will mostly be iterations of the previous size and thus simply cause repetition. -- Cappucciruno 02:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Adding to this, you've mentioned as part of your reverting the page that "Categorizing by size as opposed by type improves readability and helps players understand what is desirable.". On the contrary, I would say that it is quite hard to even understand the page's structure as it is right now, and that players will most likely care more about effects and then pick the size according to their level (with high level players always picking the same size either way and caring only for effects). How about a short list of the sizes with mention of attributes getting higher with it, followed by the list of attributes and effects of different gems as I had put it? I think mentioning that attributes get better with size should be enough for this page. -- Cappucciruno 05:53, 12 March 2016 (UTC)